Re: [boost] Call for Review: Boost.Test documentation rewrite

To me, this feels kinda backwards. You've implemented something without explaining it to anyone first or getting their feedback on the design. We have no idea whether or not it will be an improvement over the existing library or whether or not anyone will even like it and want to use it.

He did discuss the new features with the mailing list, and even presented it for a min-review: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Test-updates-in-trunk-need-for-mini... http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/test-BOOST-TEST-universal-testing-tool-td... -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Call-for-Review-Boost-Test-documentation-... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.