Note, not disagreeing, or agreeing, with you. But..
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Antony Polukhin
So may be we should think of those libraries as of "base" libraries! I do not mean that they must be moved in a single "base" folder. I'm talking only about dependency reports: those libraries must be treated by the dependency tool as a single one and must have the level 1.
You do realize that the report is only showing the node distances of the code dependency graph? No one ordained anything in that report as being any particular level. And what you are suggesting would not result in a dependency report? Those libraries are "base", because they are the very common part of Boost
framework. Not using them is more like a bad decision, reimplementing parts of them is an afwull decision. Threating them as base/common/core/main part of Boost seems reasonable.
Treating them as base, or whatever, is irrelevant to the what is in the report. -- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail