On 17 May 2016 at 16:55, Vladimir Prus
On 17/05/2016 17:51, Thijs van den Berg wrote:
Any bjam conventions discussion, validation historical choices etc is a
separate discussion. This discussion here is if we should pave the way to facilitate CMake users and do so correctly by sticking to accepted conventions, and add the CMakeLists.txt to the root or not.
No, it's not a separate discussion - that's why Rene has asked for a specific proposed change to the library requirements, in a form of diff or pull request. If that was done, this thread would have converged already.
I expect that pull request to be nothing more than "I you want to add support for CMake to your library then place the CMakeLists.txt file at the root." I don't expect it will mention the word bjam in any way.