Re: [boost] clang-win, again

degski wrote:

I think in all honesty that the whole concept is wrong, clang/llvm on windows should be treated as if it were vc (invoking clang-cl) and not as some spin-off of linux-clang, which seems to amount to try getting a square peg into a round hole. So, we should not have clang-win, but msvc-clang as a target.

That's exactly what clang-win does, it's a msvc-lookalike that uses clang-cl. But it doesn't work. So we use clang-linux, which kind of works, except for dynamic_cast.