6 Oct
2013
6 Oct
'13
7:02 p.m.
On 6 October 2013 19:57, Marshall Clow
On Oct 6, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Daniel James
wrote: On 6 October 2013 17:51, Paul A. Bristow
wrote: Is there any reason for the change in naming convention?
Not sure what you mean by this - I wasn't aware I had changed naming convention.
Not you, the beta release would normally be called 'boost_1_55_0_beta1', this time it's 'boost_1_55_0b1'. Not a big deal, but the site needs a little tweaking.
That would be my mistake, then. Sorry about that.
I can fix that for the beta release tomorrow, if you want - or we can go with the existing name.
Go ahead. I probably shouldn't have mentioned it.