12 Dec
2014
12 Dec
'14
10:14 p.m.
On 12/12/2014 11:24 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Some time ago we had a poll about formal reviews problems:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VladimirPrus/posts/5spgjicc3fv
The majority said that ten days are not enough. Of course, it's not very statistically significant, but that's the only data we've got, and we have a rather sparse schedule. How about trying two weeks for a formal review?
+1 In fact I can see review lasting another week, but I agree that two weeks should be minimum.