2 Apr
2019
2 Apr
'19
1:11 p.m.
On 4/2/19 3:55 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Michael Caisse wrote:
Note: The repository contains an expected implementation also; however, that is not being considered in this review.
To be clear, I do intend to finish `expected` and provide it as part of the library.
Will it be reviewed separately? Also, IMHO, it's better to have libraries more focused and fine grained. Why not have `expected` as a separate library?