Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:

I'm saying that ASIO header only users almost certainly will also want header only Boost.System.

I second that. I would venture a guess that the collective man-hours wasted by Boost.Asio users wrestling with their build scripts to also link in Boost.System greatly outweighs the time it would take for one person to make Boost.System header-only.