15 Apr
2013
15 Apr
'13
8:20 p.m.
2013/4/15 Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Steven Watanabe
wrote: Yeah. Adding Boost.Move emulation in existing libraries is probably a bad idea.
Should be almost as good to change Boost.Any's copy assignment operator to accept by value on C++03 and implement as swap, no? And keep the move constructor and move assignment for both C++03 and C++11. C++11 copy assignment would continue to accept by reference-to-const.
Just removed rvalues emulation via Boost.Move from Boost.Any. Now rvalues of Boost.Any work only on C++11 compilers (r83917, #6999). -- Best regards, Antony Polukhin