On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Edward Diener via Boost
...others think having the same look-and-feel of all Boost docs is an advantage.
I'm one of those people. Some of the folks working on Boost I have interacted with seem to think that the success of a library or project will/should depend solely on its technical merits. I don't share that view, I think that the presentation matters. In other words the way that the "product" (Boost, or a particular library in this case) is "marketed" to users. Engineers might find it distasteful or not "pure" that such factors play a role in the success of a library but that is the reality. For this reason I think that the uniformity of "look and feel" of the Boost documentation is one of its strengths. It is a signal of attention to quality. I know the toolchain can be difficult. I feel that the results are worth it. Thanks