Re: [boost] [testing] How do you interpret the SHA1 revision(outdated results)?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Daniel James wrote:

On 23 January 2014 11:57, Daniel James wrote:

...

I could possibly improve the commit messages. An easy change would be to include the submodule's branch (not the super-project's since commits can appear on multiple branches), I might try doing that tonight.

OK, I've done that. You can see the new message at:

https://github.com/boostorg/boost/commit/f099295d881f8ec551fe9f56086f50a6648...

Nice! If you want to shorten the SHA to the first six digits, that's plenty and shortening is a commonplace in the git world.

Let me know if you have any ideas or opinions. I want to include more information in the commit (maybe the new submodule commits or maybe the dates from the updated submodules), but I don't currently have a good way to get information from the submodules themselves, so I can't do much at the moment.

Timestamp? I didn't follow the discussion of timestamps closely, so am not sure if a timestamp could be generated that would be useful, however. --Beman