8 Feb
2018
8 Feb
'18
11:30 p.m.
On 8 February 2018 at 17:22, Peter Dimov via Boost
degski wrote:
But, do the libs you quoted use std::optional and std::string_view
(instead of their boost impersonations) when compiled with C++17?
Assuming a non-header-only library for the sake of going back onto the topic, this would create exactly the problems we've been discussing, if you link your C++17 code to the C++14-built library, or vice versa. For what gainz?
I'm probably missing the point. If that C++17 (exe-code) and C++14 (library-code) are built with the same compiler (an unavoidable C++ problem, C is great in some sense!), unless the C++17 code is in the header, why would it cause problems? degski