Re: [boost] cmake target and binary name mangling

Am 24.07.2017 um 14:28 schrieb Niall Douglas via Boost:

On 24/07/2017 13:20, Olaf van der Spek wrote:

...

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:

...

...

...

So everything you just said is all irrelevant. Meanwhile, there are *enormous* end user gains to mangling the binary name.

Very much true!

As I mentioned, me personally I'd ship the name mangled versions always. I've found it leads to less surprise.

Well, my teammates love it not having to second-guess the supported target configuration of a precompiled binary. Ciao Dani