Re: [boost] Libraries failing across the board.
David,
Thank you, I understand. I guess I will have to wait for 1.57 or try to
merge in the development branch to my local 1.56 version as soon as it is
working.
I realize we do not hold releases until all tests pass but I wonder if we
should do something like that for one release a year as a long term support
(LTS) version. It just makes relying upon boost very difficult from a end
user perspective when major development projects often times rely upon
multiple libraries. Would this be worth having a larger discussion about
in its own thread?
Thanks,
-Matt
From: David Bellot
David,
Just so I am clear, you are saying that 1.56 cannot be relied upon by users
who need ublas as there is no intention of making it work?
If that is true, this release is effectively worthless to me or anyone else
who needs any other library in conjunction with ublas? For example, I rely
heavily upon threads, serialization, asio and numeric/ublas. 1.55 did not
compile on VS2013 and there was much hope for this release which now seems
dashed.
-Matt
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 23:24:15 +0100
From: David Bellot
To: "boost <at> lists.boost.org"
Subject: Re: [boost] Libraries failing across the board.
Message-ID:
DLsn3vhx9+qSc3eN=jdfPHNSUcJA <at> mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
for ublas we decided to skip this release and concentrate on 1.57 as we
have more patches coming.
- D
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Beman Dawes
wrote:
Marshall is just a few days away from being able to put out a beta
release
candidate. (And that is very good news!)
But we still have too many libraries failing across the board on master:
accumulators
interprocess
numeric/ublas
pool
proto
spirit/repository
spirit/test
tr1
wave
See
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/summary.html
What is the hold up with these? Does anyone need help?
--Beman
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
participants (1)
-
Matthew Musto