No objections from me. I would object if you used features not supported by current major compilers. Kind regards , Alex

Hans, I think it will be fair if we give time until Monday. If no objections arrive by then, we will assume you the agreement to go for C++14. I hope this will work for reviewers as well. Best regards -- Mateusz Loskot Review Manager for the proposed Boost.Histogram On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 18:40, Hans Dembinski wrote:

Dear reviewers of boost.histogram,

thank you again for your reviews. I am currently working on the issues raised during the review and some of the requested features would be easier to implement when the library standard is raised from C++11 to C++14. This only affects the implementation side, not the user side. It would make my life easier and the implementation code more readable, because I can emulate `if constexpr` using in-place generic lambdas instead of out-of-place functors in the detail namespace. To make the library more user-friendly, I have to do more and more of these emulated `if constexpr`.

Do you object against raising the requirement from C++11 to C++14 for the implementation of boost.histogram?

Best regards, Hans

-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net