On 11/17/19 3:52 PM, Richard Hodges via Boost wrote:

On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 19:09, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

I’m probably not qualified to engage in review

LOL - of course you're qualified. We always need more reviewers who actually have some real world experience using similar libraries.

This is a great compliment to beast when writing c++ programs that must interface with node et al. Something I do a lot of.

Until now I have used nlohmann because it’s easy.

Right - we can always reviews from people who know what it means for something to be easy.

If this library is as easy but more efficient, then we all win.

...

Thanks!

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

OK, I'll make some time (somehow) to retrofit it into liquid's market data distribution code. We have good timing metrics in that plant, and it's battle-hardened in production. On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 01:21, Vinnie Falco wrote:

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:53 PM Richard Hodges wrote:

...

I’m probably not qualified to engage in review

Actually quite the opposite, you would be an ideal reviewer because your current use-case uses JSON and you would be in the best position to report on the extent to which Boost.JSON fulfills that current need.

Thanks!

-- Richard Hodges hodges.r@gmail.com office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212