Hi, I was looking at this benchmark https://github.com/mloskot/spatial_index_benchmark https://github.com/mloskot/spatial_index_benchmark which attempts to compare the performance between Boost and LibSpatialIndex. It caught my eye that Boost was magnitudes faster than LibSpatialIndex. Is there an obvious reason for this? Design considerations and trade offs? Thank you :) Regards, Kosen
Correction: You are asking about Boost.Geometry performance, not Boost
in general
On 1 March 2018 at 21:26, Ian Kosen via Boost
Hi,
I was looking at this benchmark https://github.com/mloskot/spatial_index_benchmark which attempts to compare the performance between Boost and LibSpatialIndex.
Correction: Between Boost.Geometry...
It caught my eye that Boost was magnitudes faster than LibSpatialIndex. Is there an obvious reason for this? Design considerations and trade offs?
Suggestions: 1. use [geometry] in the beginnig of subject line, so it is clear what library is the thread about 2. You may prefer to post your questions to https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
participants (2)
-
Ian Kosen -
Mateusz Loskot