[1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

newer
[1.54.0] Accidentally committed...

older
[1.54.0] [log] Permission to merge...

Marshall Clow

30 May 2013 30 May '13

6:58 p.m.

Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/ As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy. This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge. The files (and associated md5s) are: 31266b7dcc6f557ad839e4e87317cd6e *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz fbf7be9cbaf9ea6fb21ae73d0c17100d *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.bz2 7de4299ab69c941e83fe3fc46dddc15f *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.zip c73e5118ff585d9f1d68542f96a0758a *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.7z Thanks, --The release managers

Show replies by date

Tom Kent

30 May 30 May

11:38 p.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Marshall Clow wrote:

...

Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge.

The files (and associated md5s) are: 31266b7dcc6f557ad839e4e87317cd6e *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz fbf7be9cbaf9ea6fb21ae73d0c17100d *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.bz2 7de4299ab69c941e83fe3fc46dddc15f *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.zip c73e5118ff585d9f1d68542f96a0758a *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.7z

Thanks,

--The release managers

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

I'm seeing the following error on windows builds: error: No best alternative for libs/coroutine/build/allocator_sources next alternative: required properties: <link>static <target-os>windows <threading>multi not matched next alternative: required properties: <link>static <segmented-stacks>on <threading>multi not matched next alternative: required properties: <link>static <threading>multi not matched It seems to happen repeatedly for multiple versions of visual studio. Tom

Pekka Seppänen

31 May 31 May

10:33 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

On 30.5.2013 21:58, Marshall Clow wrote:

...

Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge.

Hi, serialization fails to build on MSVC8 x86. Didn't investigate further at this point. (Context also fails, but that's related to ticket #7253 and thus user config related issue; I'd like to see that ticket fixed anyway...) The same error is repeated for *_iarchive, *_wiarchive and shared_ptr_helper: compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\serialization\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\polymorphic_iarchive.obj polymorphic_iarchive.cpp S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(204) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(209) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_array_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(212) : error C2995: 'void boost_132::detail::cbi_call_constructor_hook(boost_132::detail::sp_counted_base *,T *)' : function template has already been defined S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(204) : see declaration of 'boost_132::detail::cbi_call_constructor_hook' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(218) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(223) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_array_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(226) : error C2995: 'void boost_132::detail::cbi_call_destructor_hook(boost_132::detail::sp_counted_base * ,T *)' : function template has already been defined S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\boost/serialization/detail/shared_count_132.hpp(218) : see declaration of 'boost_132::detail::cbi_call_destructor_hook' -- Pekka

Tom Kent

12:57 p.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Pekka Seppänen < pekka.seppanen@capricodesystems.com> wrote:

...

On 30.5.2013 21:58, Marshall Clow wrote:

...
Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge.

Hi,

serialization fails to build on MSVC8 x86. Didn't investigate further at this point. (Context also fails, but that's related to ticket #7253 and thus user config related issue; I'd like to see that ticket fixed anyway...)

The same error is repeated for *_iarchive, *_wiarchive and shared_ptr_helper:

compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\serialization\**build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-** static\threading-multi\**polymorphic_iarchive.obj polymorphic_iarchive.cpp S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(204) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(209) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_array_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(212) : error C2995: 'void boost_132::detail::cbi_call_** constructor_hook(boost_132::**detail::sp_counted_base *,T *)' : function template has already been defined

S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(204) : see declaration of 'boost_132::detail::cbi_call_**constructor_hook' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(218) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(223) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'checked_array_deleter' S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(226) : error C2995: 'void boost_132::detail::cbi_call_** destructor_hook(boost_132::**detail::sp_counted_base * ,T *)' : function template has already been defined

S:\Dev\boost_1_54_0_beta1\**boost/serialization/detail/**shared_count_132.hpp(218) : see declaration of 'boost_132::detail::cbi_call_**destructor_hook'

-- Pekka

______________________________**_________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/** mailman/listinfo.cgi/boosthttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

I did get a good build with msvc-8.0 (and 9.0 which is what your path above shows). Not sure what is different for you. Even with the output I mentioned in the previous message, I didn't get any compile errors on any of the visual studio builds. Tom

Pekka Seppänen

3 Jun 3 Jun

6:59 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

On 31.5.2013 15:57, Tom Kent wrote:

...

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Pekka Seppänen < pekka.seppanen@capricodesystems.com> wrote:

...
On 30.5.2013 21:58, Marshall Clow wrote:

...
Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

serialization fails to build on MSVC8 x86. Didn't investigate further at this point. (Context also fails, but that's related to ticket #7253 and thus user config related issue; I'd like to see that ticket fixed anyway...)

I did get a good build with msvc-8.0 (and 9.0 which is what your path above shows). Not sure what is different for you.

Hi, oops, I've should said MSVC9 (as in Visual Studio 2008), just so used to make the 2008 -> 8 connection. What was different for me was BOOST_SP_ENABLE_DEBUG_HOOKS. Anyway, I found the culprint and opened a ticket #8641. The bug has actually nothing to do with 1.54 as the file hasn't been modified since 2010. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8641 -- Pekka

Oliver Kowalke

7:04 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

boost.context will fail if MASM (on Windows) is not in the search path - already addressed in ticket #7253. 2013/6/3 Pekka Seppänen

...

On 31.5.2013 15:57, Tom Kent wrote:

...
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Pekka Seppänen < pekka.seppanen@**capricodesystems.com> wrote:

On 30.5.2013 21:58, Marshall Clow wrote:

...
Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at

...
http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

serialization fails to build on MSVC8 x86. Didn't investigate further at this point. (Context also fails, but that's related to ticket #7253 and thus user config related issue; I'd like to see that ticket fixed anyway...)

I did get a good build with msvc-8.0 (and 9.0 which is what your path above shows). Not sure what is different for you.

Hi,

oops, I've should said MSVC9 (as in Visual Studio 2008), just so used to make the 2008 -> 8 connection.

What was different for me was BOOST_SP_ENABLE_DEBUG_HOOKS.

Anyway, I found the culprint and opened a ticket #8641. The bug has actually nothing to do with 1.54 as the file hasn't been modified since 2010.

https://svn.boost.org/trac/**boost/ticket/8641 https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8641

-- Pekka

______________________________**_________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/** mailman/listinfo.cgi/boosthttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Pekka Seppänen

7:15 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

On 3.6.2013 10:04, Oliver Kowalke wrote:

...

boost.context will fail if MASM (on Windows) is not in the search path - already addressed in ticket #7253.

Are you confusing #7253 with some other ticket here? The #7253 that I opened some time ago was all about how MASM is called. It's in the search path, yes, but unlike CL it does not get it's arguments passed thru a RSP file and thus things like -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG= fail. Get's a bit offtopic here, sorry. -- Pekka

ecyrbe

12:47 p.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

Hi, Boost ASIO "reference" part of the documentation is not not up to date with the new changes. 2013/6/3 Pekka Seppänen

...

On 3.6.2013 10:04, Oliver Kowalke wrote:

...
boost.context will fail if MASM (on Windows) is not in the search path - already addressed in ticket #7253.

Are you confusing #7253 with some other ticket here? The #7253 that I opened some time ago was all about how MASM is called.

It's in the search path, yes, but unlike CL it does not get it's arguments passed thru a RSP file and thus things like -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG= fail.

Get's a bit offtopic here, sorry.

-- Pekka

______________________________**_________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/** mailman/listinfo.cgi/boosthttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Daniel James

2:26 p.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

On 3 June 2013 13:47, ecyrbe wrote:

...

Boost ASIO "reference" part of the documentation is not not up to date with the new changes.

It was merged to release quite late, so it's possible that I didn't pick it up in the documentation build. I can probably put the up to date documentation on the website. I'll try to do that later today.

Daniel James

8:41 p.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

On 3 June 2013 15:26, Daniel James wrote:

...

On 3 June 2013 13:47, ecyrbe wrote:

...
Boost ASIO "reference" part of the documentation is not not up to date with the new changes.

It was merged to release quite late, so it's possible that I didn't pick it up in the documentation build. I can probably put the up to date documentation on the website. I'll try to do that later today.

I've updated it on the site, that's only the asio documentation.

Daniel James

31 May 31 May

7 p.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] [1.54.0] Beta Release Candidates available

I've uploaded the release candidate to the site. The links from the release notes should now work. http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_54_0.html

Vicente J. Botet Escriba

1 Jun 1 Jun

8:38 a.m.

Le 30/05/13 20:58, Marshall Clow a écrit :

...

Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Hi, could I apply the patch (see the link) to take care of this *show stopper* http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Thread-Can-t-compile-package-task-code-wi... I would like to merge as well * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84540 see ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8626 Reintroduce BOOST_VERIFY on pthread_mutex_destroy return type https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8626 * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84411 see ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8604 constexpr does not imply 'const' in C++14 and this minor doc issue reported today: Index: libs/chrono/doc/chrono.qbk =================================================================== --- libs/chrono/doc/chrono.qbk (revision 84547) +++ libs/chrono/doc/chrono.qbk (working copy) @@ -2864,7 +2864,7 @@ duration& __duration__op_plus_eq(const duration& d); duration& __duration__op_minus_eq(const duration& d); - duration& __duration__op_mult_eq=(const rep& rhs); + duration& __duration__op_mult_eq(const rep& rhs); duration& __duration__op_div_eq(const rep& rhs); duration& __duration__op_mod_eq(const rep& rhs); duration& __duration__op_mod_eq2(const duration& rhs); Best, Vicente

Eric Niebler

4 Jun 4 Jun

5:25 a.m.

On 6/1/2013 1:38 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

...

could I apply the patch (see the link) to take care of this *show stopper* http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Thread-Can-t-compile-package-task-code-wi...

I would like to merge as well * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84540 see ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8626 Reintroduce BOOST_VERIFY on pthread_mutex_destroy return type https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8626 * https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/84411 see ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8604 constexpr does not imply 'const' in C++14

and this minor doc issue reported today:

Index: libs/chrono/doc/chrono.qbk =================================================================== --- libs/chrono/doc/chrono.qbk (revision 84547) +++ libs/chrono/doc/chrono.qbk (working copy) @@ -2864,7 +2864,7 @@ duration& __duration__op_plus_eq(const duration& d); duration& __duration__op_minus_eq(const duration& d);

- duration& __duration__op_mult_eq=(const rep& rhs); + duration& __duration__op_mult_eq(const rep& rhs); duration& __duration__op_div_eq(const rep& rhs); duration& __duration__op_mod_eq(const rep& rhs); duration& __duration__op_mod_eq2(const duration& rhs);

The release branch is now open for all bug fixes and doc changes. No review manager approval is needed. Thanks, -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org

David Bellot

1 Jun 1 Jun

10:23 p.m.

Hi, it seems the latest patch I applied to ublas has not been taken into account. I'm afraid but maybe I applied it a little bit to late. On the other hand the release notes have been correctly updated. So there is a mismatch between the beta version and the release notes. Would it be possible to have the beta version adjusted to the latest version on the svn rep. The only directory I changed is .../boost/numeric/ublas. Many thanks and sorry again if I was too late. Didn't check my calendar properly. Best, David On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Marshall Clow wrote:

...

Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge.

The files (and associated md5s) are: 31266b7dcc6f557ad839e4e87317cd6e *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz fbf7be9cbaf9ea6fb21ae73d0c17100d *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.bz2 7de4299ab69c941e83fe3fc46dddc15f *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.zip c73e5118ff585d9f1d68542f96a0758a *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.7z

Thanks,

--The release managers

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Daniel James

10:33 p.m.

On 1 June 2013 23:23, David Bellot wrote:

...

it seems the latest patch I applied to ublas has not been taken into account. I'm afraid but maybe I applied it a little bit to late. On the other hand the release notes have been correctly updated. So there is a mismatch between the beta version and the release notes.

Would it be possible to have the beta version adjusted to the latest version on the svn rep. The only directory I changed is .../boost/numeric/ublas.

I don't know if there's going to be another beta release candidate, so I moved the uBLAS changes to a separate section. I'll add it back to the main notes when appropriate.

Kohei Takahashi

3 Jun 3 Jun

5:29 p.m.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I found a regression in Boost.StaticAssert, which is introduced with rev 86886. I filed this issue at https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8644 . Thanks, Kohei Takahashi (2013/05/31 3:58), Marshall Clow wrote:

...

Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge.

The files (and associated md5s) are: 31266b7dcc6f557ad839e4e87317cd6e *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz fbf7be9cbaf9ea6fb21ae73d0c17100d *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.tar.bz2 7de4299ab69c941e83fe3fc46dddc15f *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.zip c73e5118ff585d9f1d68542f96a0758a *boost_1_54_0_beta1_rc1.7z

Thanks,

--The release managers

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRrNKVAAoJEGGyPxPRp/zoaFUQAKqsJpsESAhE7xjU/2degpyL IB7XEe1q4v02vPuOqYB6AIaXp5gVUebF6c6JaD8CqHrA4lg8ouQVx0C5V8QujqQy ZkM1yqpVtDmgEp9IqqmgvAxzeAMCvRlfYgNI4M/ICWBKawuM3L5RJ63/87nzAnFN uomluhhPbHyHQpM8RelX76xn18UkBADlPFRFyCgGZDhOkycFkQWcM8IEkNzFQGLj 8+gA3JdzjLk6pFZ82JW+Ykp5w8WuTYUoJaEN4wuZrXuy3i3L/XC6A+uKY3/diBYa R4zU3egb/cC/doHpFvndA3zOy3pWO3h03dFQKTjFfmseT6Ir8b2dmdyf0x2nV/7h 4ZNouKT6So4x43246uYnxBPUCIwjxB9CwtZ2uZSezbIYcUisKJmsIsE/XdlFkr+B 22y0HS/iZ5hecvZ5Ql+jq1UC4vNTwkyBDJrilaQ2laI8H+7dqC1Stt1wYJjTR4ZR pBLrcA7D77E1ddVSi55k4oa0XCzBli3uETCQD1B53WZoa/w8ufv0663Byb1tLNSb MTZSihnCKl65FNNmpwhDie52EK13pc4oEFfrbN1dhpW/ShFAohqpzbQcEtYMzdtO qA6nA+2JLc2kamehfUI7HDZjtxCujnKHzxuDObiCNXei3nPFEay6k6yKHfYLL9vD pROerlQ/umpBhnNOqvBh =0JjT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

John Maddock

6:22 p.m.

...

I found a regression in Boost.StaticAssert, which is introduced with rev 86886. I filed this issue at https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8644 .

Thanks, Kohei Takahashi

(2013/05/31 3:58), Marshall Clow wrote:

...
Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

Thanks for the report, I'm going to be away for the next few days can someone else deal with this? John.

Marshall Clow

4 Jun 4 Jun

12:07 a.m.

On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:22 AM, John Maddock wrote:

...

...
I found a regression in Boost.StaticAssert, which is introduced with rev 86886. I filed this issue at https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8644 .

Thanks, Kohei Takahashi

(2013/05/31 3:58), Marshall Clow wrote:

...
Release candidate files for 1.54.0 beta 1 are available at http://boost.cowic.de/rc/

Thanks for the report, I'm going to be away for the next few days can someone else deal with this?

John -- I'll take a look at it. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki

4194

Age (days ago)

4199

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

17 comments

11 participants

participants (11)

Daniel James
David Bellot
ecyrbe
Eric Niebler
John Maddock
Kohei Takahashi
Marshall Clow
Oliver Kowalke
Pekka Seppänen
Tom Kent
Vicente J. Botet Escriba