On Saturday 31 May 2014 13:57:11 Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

2014-05-31 9:54 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev :

...

Hi,

I've noticed a new top-level header boost/bad_optional_access.hpp. It wasn't present in 1.55, so it is a recent development. AFAIK, top level headers are discouraged, all library specific headers, except the "include all" header, should be inside the library directory. Am I correct?

If so, could this header be moved inside boost/optional?

I agree. And to my knowledge it is in boost/optional/. Are you looking at the head of develop branch? (I think at some point in the past I incorrectly put it directly into boost, but it has been fixed since.)

Oh, right. I've updated the local copy and it's in boost/optional now. Sorry for the noise.