[PropertyTree] Pull request removing usage of typeid()
Hi, In February, I submitted a pull request that removes the usage of typeid from property_tree and replaces it with boost.type_index. This allows me to use property_tree with rtti disabled, which I need sometimes. https://github.com/boostorg/property_tree/pull/20 I've had no feedback on the change. Can it be merged? Thanks, -- chris
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 at 10:45 Chris Glover
Hi,
In February, I submitted a pull request that removes the usage of typeid from property_tree and replaces it with boost.type_index. This allows me to use property_tree with rtti disabled, which I need sometimes.
https://github.com/boostorg/property_tree/pull/20
I've had no feedback on the change. Can it be merged?
Thanks,
-- chris
Hi, Considering that I've heard nothing about this on github or the mailing list, I can only assume that there is no maintainer for property_tree. If that's the case, what's the process for getting something merged? Thanks, -- chris
Change title to improve filter matching and cc Sebastian.
Benedek
On Aug 28, 2016 5:48 PM, "Chris Glover"
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 at 10:45 Chris Glover
wrote: Hi,
In February, I submitted a pull request that removes the usage of typeid from property_tree and replaces it with boost.type_index. This allows me to use property_tree with rtti disabled, which I need sometimes.
https://github.com/boostorg/property_tree/pull/20
I've had no feedback on the change. Can it be merged?
Thanks,
-- chris
Hi,
Considering that I've heard nothing about this on github or the mailing list, I can only assume that there is no maintainer for property_tree.
If that's the case, what's the process for getting something merged?
Thanks,
-- chris
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (2)
-
Benedek Thaler
-
Chris Glover