<please do not top post> On 7/19/17 15:58, Alexander Zaitsev via Boost wrote:

Yes, i know about this program. But what about libraries which have not any company-maintainer?

The link provided also refers to the CMT (Community Maintenance Team). More details are here: https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/CommunityMaintenance -- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com

On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 20:17 -0600, Gary Furnish via Boost wrote:

I've tried without success to get attn of property tree maintainers.  I think it is unmaintained.

It definitely is unmaintaned. It has PRs from over a year without any response from the maintainer. It also doesn't allow opening issues either. I don't see how a open source library can be maintained without allowing users to open bug reports.

On Jul 19, 2017 7:50 PM, "Michael Caisse via Boost" wrote:

...

<please do not top post>

On 7/19/17 15:58, Alexander Zaitsev via Boost wrote:

...

Yes, i know about this program. But what about libraries which have not any company-maintainer?

The link provided also refers to the CMT (Community Maintenance Team). More details are here: https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/CommunityMaintenance

-- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boo st

On 07/20/17 18:42, paul via Boost wrote:

On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 20:17 -0600, Gary Furnish via Boost wrote:

...

I've tried without success to get attn of property tree maintainers. I think it is unmaintained.

It definitely is unmaintaned. It has PRs from over a year without any response from the maintainer. It also doesn't allow opening issues either. I don't see how a open source library can be maintained without allowing users to open bug reports.

You can create bug reports in Trac. There are actually quite a few of bug reports there.

On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 09:06 -0700, Michael Caisse via Boost wrote:

On 7/20/17 08:42, paul via Boost wrote:

...

On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 20:17 -0600, Gary Furnish via Boost wrote:

...

I've tried without success to get attn of property tree maintainers.  I think it is unmaintained.

It definitely is unmaintaned. It has PRs from over a year without any response from the maintainer. It also doesn't allow opening issues either. I don't see how a open source library can be maintained without allowing users to open bug reports.

Issues for property tree are in Trac : <https://svn.boost.org/trac10/query?status=new&status=reopened&component=pro perty_tree&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=milestone&co l=time&order=priority>

And there is no link to this issue tracker on property tree's page.

On 7/20/2017 11:42 AM, paul via Boost wrote:

On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 20:17 -0600, Gary Furnish via Boost wrote:

...

I've tried without success to get attn of property tree maintainers. I think it is unmaintained.

It definitely is unmaintaned. It has PRs from over a year without any response from the maintainer. It also doesn't allow opening issues either. I don't see how a open source library can be maintained without allowing users to open bug reports.

The official maintainer and one of the library authors is Sebastian Redl. Perhaps interested parties can attempt to contact him by e-mail. If he can no longer maintain the library Boost can consider someone else to maintain the library or the library can be added to the CMT.

...

On Jul 19, 2017 7:50 PM, "Michael Caisse via Boost" wrote:

...

<please do not top post>

On 7/19/17 15:58, Alexander Zaitsev via Boost wrote:

...

Yes, i know about this program. But what about libraries which have not any company-maintainer?

The link provided also refers to the CMT (Community Maintenance Team). More details are here: https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/CommunityMaintenance

-- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com