Re: [boost] boost.asem seeking endorsement
Hi.
I've a simple question: those are primitives built around asio, and
according to the documentation you say "This library is not meant as the
default method of synchronization of asio-based apps, but to be used by
library developers.", so there's a reason to create a different library
instead that trying to merge them directly into boost::asio?
Regards
Daniele Lupo
-----Original Message-----
From: Boost
I would like them to be in asio,
but I am not the asio author.
Chris did not seem interested in the idea.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:39 PM
Hi.
I've a simple question: those are primitives built around asio, and according to the documentation you say "This library is not meant as the default method of synchronization of asio-based apps, but to be used by library developers.", so there's a reason to create a different library instead that trying to merge them directly into boost::asio?
Regards
Daniele Lupo
-----Original Message----- From: Boost
On Behalf Of Klemens Morgenstern via Boost Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 6:13 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: Klemens Morgenstern Subject: [boost] boost.asem seeking endorsement Heya Boost Community,
I am seeking endorsement for my boost.asem library.
It provides the following asio-based synchronization primitives:
- barrier - condition_variable - mutex - semaphore
Asio currently has timers & (experimental) channels that can help. However, I think there is a need for more purpose-made utilities to help more complex asio-based libraries (requests, redis, mysql et al.)
Code: https://github.com/klemens-morgenstern/asem Docs: https://klemens.dev/asem/
I'm also not too happy with the name, but so far I only came up with an acronym: Semaphore, Condition_variable, And Mutex. Suggestions are welcome.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (2)
-
jepessen@wteam.it
-
Klemens Morgenstern