On 4/28/2015 11:06 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote:

H List,

It pains me to say that I can't find sufficient time to maintain PropertyTree the way I should. Bugfixes are delayed, regressions appear, and the long-needed documentation improvement is going nowhere. I made a commitment last C++Now to add C++11 support and document the way I did it in order to help other Boost developers, and failed to do so. New features, like proper encoding support or type-preserving JSON parsing simply aren't happening.

It's clear that I can't do it alone. So I am looking for help, someone else who cares about the library and can help me with bugfixes and future development. This could be an individual, a group of people, or the community maintenance team, but I definitely need someone if PropertyTree is supposed to continue as a useful part of Boost.

Anyone interested or know somebody who would be interested, please let me know.

Sebastian

Hi Sebastian, I would be glad to help. I have been using ptree in various projects for various purposes and I like it a lot. At some point I've even created a working type-preserving version (based on basic_ptree) with the intention of creating read/write functions for MessagePack (msgpack.org) format. This could also be used for type-preserving JSON parsing you mentioned (or perhaps basic_ptree> would be a better choice?). Anyway, I believe I can find some time to work on this library. Please let me know how would you like to proceed. Boris Rasin