Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

newer
boost_check_library.py: correct...

older
[filesystem] Pull request needs...

Marshall Clow

6 Aug 2017 6 Aug '17

7:07 p.m.

The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at: https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/ The SHA256 checksums are as follows: 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy. Thanks! -- The release managers

Show replies by date

Marshall Clow

6 Aug 6 Aug

8:11 p.m.

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Marshall Clow wrote:

...

The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

I have built the release with Apple's clang (Apple LLVM version 8.0.0 (clang-800.0.42.1)) with the following results: * C++03 - everything built successfully. * C++11 - Boost.Fiber failed to build * C++14 - Boost.Fiber failed to build * C++1z - Boost.Fiber failed to build -- Marshall

Peppard

8:21 p.m.

On 2017-08-06 21:07, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

The regression regarding boost/math/common_factor_ct.hpp (vs math_fwd.hpp) seems to be still there. (For details please see the original mail and replies: https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2017/07/237452.php) What I presume is the fix (https://github.com/boostorg/math/pull/75) was merged into develop about 12 hours ago, some automatic CI tests still running. (I guess it would be useful to have the pre-releases tagged in the super-project and each library, just like the 1.64 beta releases.)

Tom Westerhout

10:04 p.m.

On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...

The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk: * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++) 1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is there a random_shuffle. 2) Boost.Wave failed due to errors in Spirit. There's no auto_ptr in std:: anymore. 3) Boost.Locale failed, again because of auto_ptr. * GCC (-std=c++14) Everything builds fine. I would like to complain about the amount of warnings though... Way to many for my taste. Tom

Raffi Enficiaud

10:59 p.m.

Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :

...

On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:

* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)

1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is there a random_shuffle.

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE and the ones of bind1st by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing? Thanks for the report, Raffi

Tom Westerhout

11:21 p.m.

On 07/08/2017, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost wrote:

...

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE

and the ones of bind1st by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS

Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?

Thanks for the report, Raffi

It could be me, but I've run a grep on these macros: for f in $(find ./boost/config -type f); do echo $f: $(grep "NO_CXX98" $f); done And only boost/config/stdlib/dinkumware.hpp gave some results. Could it be the case that some parts of Config haven't been updated to support the latest version of libc++ yet? Tom

Marshall Clow

7 Aug 7 Aug

12:04 a.m.

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

...

Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :

...
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:

* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)

1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is there a random_shuffle.

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE

and the ones of bind1st by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS

Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?

As a test, I added the following lines to libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp (after line 98): #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE #endif #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS #endif and the number of failures dropped quite a bit (66 to 23) There was still few Boost.Test failures, though: clang-darwin.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/unit_test_parameters.o In file included from libs/test/src/unit_test_parameters.cpp:16: In file included from ./boost/test/impl/unit_test_parameters.ipp:39: In file included from ./boost/test/utils/runtime/cla/parser.hpp:24: ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:118:42: error: no member named 'bind1st' in namespace 'std' if( std::find_if( first2, last2, BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *first1 ) ) == last2 ) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST' #define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) ) ~~~~~^ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:168:60: error: no member named 'bind1st' in namespace 'std' while( --it1 != first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2, BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) == last2 ) {} ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST' #define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) ) ~~~~~^ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:170:58: error: no member named 'bind1st' in namespace 'std' return it1 == first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2, BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) == last2 ? last1 : it1; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST' #define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) ) ~~~~~^ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:215:60: error: no member named 'bind1st' in namespace 'std' while( --it1 != first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2, BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) != last2 ) {} ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST' #define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) ) ~~~~~^ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:217:58: error: no member named 'bind1st' in namespace 'std' return it1 == first1 && std::find_if( first2, last2, BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST( pred, *it1 ) ) == last2 ? last1 : it1; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./boost/test/utils/algorithm.hpp:25:38: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST' #define BOOST_TEST_BIND1ST(F,A) std::bind1st( (F), (A) ) ~~~~~^ 5 errors generated. "/Sources/LLVM/bin/bin/clang++" -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -Wno-variadic-macros -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++ -I /Sources/LLVM/llvm/projects/libcxx -O3 -O3 -Wno-inline -Wall -pedantic -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED -DBOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_TIMER_DYN_LINK=1 -DNDEBUG -I"." -c -o "bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/unit_test_parameters.o" "libs/test/src/unit_test_parameters.cpp" ...failed clang-darwin.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/unit_test_parameters.o... -- and -- clang-darwin.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/framework.o In file included from libs/test/src/framework.cpp:16: ./boost/test/impl/framework.ipp:745:30: error: no member named 'random_shuffle' in namespace 'std' std::random_shuffle( children_with_the_same_rank.begin(), children_with_the_same_rank.end(), rand_gen ); ~~~~~^ 1 error generated. "/Sources/LLVM/bin/bin/clang++" -x c++ -Wno-c99-extensions -Wno-variadic-macros -std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++ -I /Sources/LLVM/llvm/projects/libcxx -O3 -O3 -Wno-inline -Wall -pedantic -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED -DBOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_TIMER_DYN_LINK=1 -DNDEBUG -I"." -c -o "bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/framework.o" "libs/test/src/framework.cpp" ...failed clang-darwin.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/test/build/clang-darwin-tot1z/release/threading-multi/framework.o... These *may* (I haven't traced it yet) be due to the configuration header didn't get included in this case. -- Marshall

Marshall Clow

12:27 a.m.

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Marshall Clow wrote:

...

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

...
Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :

...
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:

* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)

1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is there a random_shuffle.

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE

and the ones of bind1st by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS

Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?

As a test, I added the following lines to libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp (after line 98): #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE #endif #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS #endif

Ignore these results; I edited the wrong version of the file. New results soon.

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow

12:51 a.m.

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

...

Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :

...
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:

* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)

1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is there a random_shuffle.

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE

and the ones of bind1st by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS

Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?

As a test, I added the following lines to libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp: #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE #endif #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS #endif and Boost.Test build successfully. Locale, Wave, and fiber still failed. I will prepare a PR for Boost.config. -- Marshall

Raffi Enficiaud

1:03 a.m.

Le 07.08.17 à 02:51, Marshall Clow via Boost a écrit :

...

On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

...
Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :

...
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:

* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)

1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is there a random_shuffle.

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE

and the ones of bind1st by #ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS

Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?

As a test, I added the following lines to libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp:

#if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE #endif #if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) && !defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE) # define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS #endif

and Boost.Test build successfully.

Locale, Wave, and fiber still failed.

I will prepare a PR for Boost.config.

-- Marshall

Wonderful! many thanks for the super quick analysis and fix! Raffi

Andrey Semashev

8:31 a.m.

On 08/07/17 01:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost wrote:

...

On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:

* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)

2) Boost.Wave failed due to errors in Spirit. There's no auto_ptr in std:: anymore.

The current Boost.Spirit master doesn't use std::auto_ptr. It was removed in e361754faf62b8b513cfc5b39f3153be92342454 more than a year ago from develop. I think, Joel merged it to master today, so the release needs to update too. The current Boost.Wave master still uses std::auto_ptr in samples (which I think is code examples). It was fixed in develop[1] but not have been merged to master. [1]: https://github.com/boostorg/wave/pull/11

Gregor Jasny

9 Aug 9 Aug

8:30 a.m.

Hello, On 06.08.17 21:07, Marshall Clow via Boost-users wrote:

...

The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3 boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238 boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Could you please include https://github.com/boostorg/fiber/pull/140 in the final release? Thanks, Gregor

Marcel Raad

10:12 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

...

From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Marshall Clow via Boost-users Sent: Sonntag, 6. August 2017 21:07 To: boost@lists.boost.org List ; boost-users@lists.boost.org Cc: Marshall Clow Subject: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available [...] As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

With Visual C++ 2017 and /permissive-, ScopeExit is still broken, for which there's an open PR: https://github.com/boostorg/scope_exit/pull/3 Looks good otherwise on MSVC 14.11, tested with /std=cpplatest and _HAS_AUTO_PTR_ETC=1, targeting Windows 10 and XP, 32 bit and 64 bit, built as static libraries. Marcel

2666

Age (days ago)

2669

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

12 comments

7 participants

participants (7)

Andrey Semashev
Gregor Jasny
Marcel Raad
Marshall Clow
Peppard
Raffi Enficiaud
Tom Westerhout