Master branch open for merging
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy> -- The Boost Release Team
Marshall Clow wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy
I ask permission to merge the following changes to master: # Boost.Endian: https://github.com/boostorg/endian/commit/2bd479044b796eaa9bff27ee019688fa55... This fixes a regression reported in https://github.com/boostorg/endian/issues/33. # Boost.Iostreams: https://github.com/boostorg/iostreams/commit/703e9a077b899417ead9fb6c35db8f0... When Iostreams builds zlib or bzip2 from source, install CMake configuration files for these two libraries (the libraries themselves are already being installed.) # tools/boost_install: https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/68c1506bd46dd75bc428210021c... When generating the CMake configuration files, strip suffix from `zlib.1` and `bzip2.1`, to enable Iostreams to find the dependencies from the previous commit. https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/096f05db519ae787ad9f6481d6a... https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/cf4b78006e8f22fb883ad56ce58... https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/ba82fdf6c14e9c111c12c921cdd... Add a test for using Iostreams from CMake. These commits are large, but they only affect testing on Travis and Appveyor and do not change the functionality of either boost_install or Iostreams. They just enable the previous two changes to be tested. # Superproject: https://github.com/boostorg/boost/commit/73410010da498717461a755dbeae3ab7daa... This omits the suggestion to run "b2 headers" when bootstrap.bat is run from a release.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:34 AM Peter Dimov via Boost
Marshall Clow wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy
I ask permission to merge the following changes to master:
These all look good to me. Thanks! -- Marshall
# Boost.Endian:
https://github.com/boostorg/endian/commit/2bd479044b796eaa9bff27ee019688fa55...
This fixes a regression reported in https://github.com/boostorg/endian/issues/33.
# Boost.Iostreams:
https://github.com/boostorg/iostreams/commit/703e9a077b899417ead9fb6c35db8f0...
When Iostreams builds zlib or bzip2 from source, install CMake configuration files for these two libraries (the libraries themselves are already being installed.)
# tools/boost_install:
https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/68c1506bd46dd75bc428210021c...
When generating the CMake configuration files, strip suffix from `zlib.1` and `bzip2.1`, to enable Iostreams to find the dependencies from the previous commit.
https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/096f05db519ae787ad9f6481d6a...
https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/cf4b78006e8f22fb883ad56ce58...
https://github.com/boostorg/boost_install/commit/ba82fdf6c14e9c111c12c921cdd...
Add a test for using Iostreams from CMake. These commits are large, but they only affect testing on Travis and Appveyor and do not change the functionality of either boost_install or Iostreams. They just enable the previous two changes to be tested.
# Superproject:
https://github.com/boostorg/boost/commit/73410010da498717461a755dbeae3ab7daa...
This omits the suggestion to run "b2 headers" when bootstrap.bat is run from a release.
On 13. Mar 2019, at 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost
wrote: The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask for permission to merge this change to the master of Boost.Histogram: https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/90882ac086e8cec2a369c77c78f38d6... boost::histogram::axis::variant is using boost::variant internally as an implementation detail (we want to be able to change it in the future). While working on the Python wrapper for Boost.Histogram, an ambiguity was discovered in the visit function in this design. The ambiguity is resolved by using composition instead of private inheritance, which also simplifies the code. Best regards, Hans
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:01 AM Hans Dembinski
On 13. Mar 2019, at 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask for permission to merge this change to the master of Boost.Histogram:
https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/90882ac086e8cec2a369c77c78f38d6...
boost::histogram::axis::variant is using boost::variant internally as an implementation detail (we want to be able to change it in the future). While working on the Python wrapper for Boost.Histogram, an ambiguity was discovered in the visit function in this design. The ambiguity is resolved by using composition instead of private inheritance, which also simplifies the code.
Yes, go ahead. -- Marshall
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:47 AM Marshall Clow via Boost
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges
I'd like to merge everything from 229 to the latest: https://github.com/vinniefalco/beast/commits/v233 However, there are build failures on Travis due to changes in Boost.Context: https://github.com/boostorg/context/issues/103 Thanks
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:41 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
However, there are build failures on Travis due to changes in Boost.Context:
Odd; the test runners seem reasonably happy: https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/context.html -- Marshall
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:30 AM Marshall Clow via Boost
Odd; the test runners seem reasonably happy: https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/context.html
There was a Mac OS fix to Boost.Context: https://github.com/boostorg/context/commit/42ac5103195e2f52a0b4a8a52d267fd11... Beast builds on Mac OS Travis now, but the clang configuration still has the error: https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/beast/jobs/506539071 Thanks
Dear Marshal, On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:47 PM Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask for permission to merge the following commits into master for Boost.Histogram: https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/ae85b2a6b73bf2dfb6690d292fecad8... https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/6391709d54b9866d4945ec44f145d6a... Improves and simplifies sanitized tests in the CI and fixes the following issues in the test matrix https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/Marshall-UBSAN-hist... https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/Marshall-UBSAN-hist... https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/Marshall-UBSAN-hist... https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/fbc24390f9eacf13c2e6d11e2d8446e... This fixes an embarrassing spelling mistake in the public interface. I am very glad that this was found before the first release of Histogram. This is technically a breaking change, but I think an exception can be made here, because Boost.Histogram is a new library and doesn't have an established user base yet. https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/e48be4c90da41472cda93a5a9587be6... This fixes an oversight, where a member type that should be private was public. This should be fixed before the release so that users will not rely on this. Best regards, Hans
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 5:31 AM Hans Dembinski via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Dear Marshal,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:47 PM Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask for permission to merge the following commits into master for Boost.Histogram:
Looks good to me. -- Marshall
https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/ae85b2a6b73bf2dfb6690d292fecad8...
https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/6391709d54b9866d4945ec44f145d6a...
Improves and simplifies sanitized tests in the CI and fixes the following issues in the test matrix
https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/Marshall-UBSAN-hist...
https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/Marshall-UBSAN-hist...
https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/Marshall-UBSAN-hist...
https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/fbc24390f9eacf13c2e6d11e2d8446e... This fixes an embarrassing spelling mistake in the public interface. I am very glad that this was found before the first release of Histogram. This is technically a breaking change, but I think an exception can be made here, because Boost.Histogram is a new library and doesn't have an established user base yet.
https://github.com/boostorg/histogram/commit/e48be4c90da41472cda93a5a9587be6... This fixes an oversight, where a member type that should be private was public. This should be fixed before the release so that users will not rely on this.
Best regards, Hans
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
On 13.03.19 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
Hi, I would like to merge this to master: https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/d44509b4e4d25afb32e8832e404b38e95681... Mostly documentation changes. All tests green on my side. Thanks! Raffi
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:24 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 13.03.19 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
Hi,
I would like to merge this to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/d44509b4e4d25afb32e8832e404b38e95681...
Mostly documentation changes. All tests green on my side.
Go for it! -- Marshall
On 19.03.19 15:26, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:24 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 13.03.19 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
Hi,
I would like to merge this to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/d44509b4e4d25afb32e8832e404b38e95681...
Mostly documentation changes. All tests green on my side.
Go for it! -- Marshall
Thanks, I would like to merge this additional changes/fixes. The diff is visible here: https://github.com/boostorg/test/compare/master..b9d74d1f55be2d70cdaee9bdb3e... Changes: - Windows.h -> windows.h - comment unused variable and remove dead code - the rest is about trying to fix a test that should not be run on GCC4.8 and causing noise on Travis. It will be certainly another permission to merge later this week, only about documentation. Raffi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:07 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 19.03.19 15:26, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:24 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 13.03.19 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
Hi,
I would like to merge this to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/d44509b4e4d25afb32e8832e404b38e95681...
Mostly documentation changes. All tests green on my side.
Go for it! -- Marshall
Thanks, I would like to merge this additional changes/fixes. The diff is visible here:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/compare/master..b9d74d1f55be2d70cdaee9bdb3e...
Changes: - Windows.h -> windows.h - comment unused variable and remove dead code - the rest is about trying to fix a test that should not be run on GCC4.8 and causing noise on Travis.
It will be certainly another permission to merge later this week, only about documentation.
Go ahead. -- Marshall
On 21.03.19 14:27, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:07 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
Thanks, I would like to merge this additional changes/fixes. The diff is visible here:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/compare/master..b9d74d1f55be2d70cdaee9bdb3e...
Changes: - Windows.h -> windows.h - comment unused variable and remove dead code - the rest is about trying to fix a test that should not be run on GCC4.8 and causing noise on Travis.
It will be certainly another permission to merge later this week, only about documentation.
I would like to merge the following to master: * https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/6a8773f62693877cfc9ac19df9990445a4ff... : documentation changes only * https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/9ffe07ebd0fc1684b5f0fa8890872c91952b... : change in a cast Tests are green on my CI on develop. Thanks! Raffi PS: those are the last changes for 1.70 on my side.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:40 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 21.03.19 14:27, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:07 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
Thanks, I would like to merge this additional changes/fixes. The diff is visible here:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/compare/master..b9d74d1f55be2d70cdaee9bdb3e...
Changes: - Windows.h -> windows.h - comment unused variable and remove dead code - the rest is about trying to fix a test that should not be run on GCC4.8 and causing noise on Travis.
It will be certainly another permission to merge later this week, only about documentation.
I would like to merge the following to master:
*
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/6a8773f62693877cfc9ac19df9990445a4ff... : documentation changes only
*
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/9ffe07ebd0fc1684b5f0fa8890872c91952b... : change in a cast
Tests are green on my CI on develop.
Approved. -- Marshall
On 25.03.19 14:48, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:40 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 21.03.19 14:27, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:07 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
Thanks, I would like to merge this additional changes/fixes. The diff is visible here:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/compare/master..b9d74d1f55be2d70cdaee9bdb3e...
Changes: - Windows.h -> windows.h - comment unused variable and remove dead code - the rest is about trying to fix a test that should not be run on GCC4.8 and causing noise on Travis.
It will be certainly another permission to merge later this week, only about documentation.
I would like to merge the following to master:
*
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/6a8773f62693877cfc9ac19df9990445a4ff... : documentation changes only
*
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/9ffe07ebd0fc1684b5f0fa8890872c91952b... : change in a cast
Tests are green on my CI on develop.
Thanks! Now ... :) I would like to merge this to master: https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/ec3aeac46b7f3ec287e1655c63cb55314504... This is to fix the warning issues mentioned in another thread. Tests green on my side (VS2008/2013/2015/2017, appleclang6 C++03/11, gcc5 C++03/11, UBSAN gcc8/C++14, UBSAN clang). Warning seems to be solved until the next visibility issue comes up. Thanks, Raffi
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:48 AM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 25.03.19 14:48, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:40 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 21.03.19 14:27, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:07 PM Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
Thanks, I would like to merge this additional changes/fixes. The diff
is
visible here:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/compare/master..b9d74d1f55be2d70cdaee9bdb3e...
Changes: - Windows.h -> windows.h - comment unused variable and remove dead code - the rest is about trying to fix a test that should not be run on GCC4.8 and causing noise on Travis.
It will be certainly another permission to merge later this week, only about documentation.
I would like to merge the following to master:
*
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/6a8773f62693877cfc9ac19df9990445a4ff...
: documentation changes only
*
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/9ffe07ebd0fc1684b5f0fa8890872c91952b...
: change in a cast
Tests are green on my CI on develop.
Thanks! Now ... :) I would like to merge this to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/test/commit/ec3aeac46b7f3ec287e1655c63cb55314504...
This is to fix the warning issues mentioned in another thread. Tests green on my side (VS2008/2013/2015/2017, appleclang6 C++03/11, gcc5 C++03/11, UBSAN gcc8/C++14, UBSAN clang). Warning seems to be solved until the next visibility issue comes up.
Approved. -- Marshall
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 17:47 Marshall Clow via Boost
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
Requesting permission to merge https://github.com/boostorg/variant/commit/7ecf721f2b20df142d73d0dc1fe0677ab... (along with https://github.com/boostorg/variant/commit/90e7fbae4848dff3f3132e5056168cee7... that does nothing docs, b2 build or code related). Tests are green.
On 19/03/2019 16:16, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 17:47 Marshall Clow via Boost
wrote: The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
If it's permissible, I have two linked changes to Math and multiprecision libraries that would be good to merge: https://github.com/boostorg/multiprecision/commit/3772428c1bdacbd1ddb30dce7e... https://github.com/boostorg/math/commit/08b7a6145f90eff611a1afbdd21e9c54faeb... Plus one minor commit for Math that addresses some numeric_limits<__float128> issues: https://github.com/boostorg/math/commit/072ebaac2506876e10cd1b52cde2210eb5ce... A more comprehensive fix for the issues raised on the list about this will have to wait till after the next release. Thanks, John. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 11:02 AM John Maddock via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 19/03/2019 16:16, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 17:47 Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
If it's permissible, I have two linked changes to Math and multiprecision libraries that would be good to merge:
https://github.com/boostorg/multiprecision/commit/3772428c1bdacbd1ddb30dce7e...
https://github.com/boostorg/math/commit/08b7a6145f90eff611a1afbdd21e9c54faeb...
Plus one minor commit for Math that addresses some numeric_limits<__float128> issues:
https://github.com/boostorg/math/commit/072ebaac2506876e10cd1b52cde2210eb5ce...
A more comprehensive fix for the issues raised on the list about this will have to wait till after the next release.
Those look fine to me. -- Marshall
If it's permissible, I have two linked changes to Math and multiprecision libraries that would be good to merge:
https://github.com/boostorg/multiprecision/commit/3772428c1bdacbd1ddb30dce7e...
https://github.com/boostorg/math/commit/08b7a6145f90eff611a1afbdd21e9c54faeb...
Plus one minor commit for Math that addresses some numeric_limits<__float128> issues:
https://github.com/boostorg/math/commit/072ebaac2506876e10cd1b52cde2210eb5ce...
A more comprehensive fix for the issues raised on the list about this will have to wait till after the next release.
Those look fine to me.
Merged, thanks! --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:47 PM Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
I ask for permission to merge a few more commits to the master for Histogram: https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram/commit/43f88383acffa380aba03d7cb31e4... This is an important bug-fix. The bug caused an assert to fail in debug mode and a segfault in release mode. A missing unit test was added to test the bug condition. https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram/commit/706fa31ca2a6dfb5ef0004904146d... Fixes all warnings on msvc that come from histogram code. https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram/commit/0e9231a24fd8d070aa85b925f610d... Restore building coverage reports on Travis (accidentally broken in a previous commit). https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram/commit/95ef98091e1022c35de59ebbb400a... https://github.com/HDembinski/histogram/commit/558907eca7c03b331185fa1b3eef8... Turn off building branches on Travis and Appveyor (I use PRs now to develop changes and to let CI test them).
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:59 PM Hans Dembinski
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:47 PM Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
I ask for permission to merge a few more commits to the master for Histogram:
Go ahead. -- Marshall
On 3/13/19 5:46 PM, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
May I merge this change to Boost.Integer master: https://github.com/boostorg/integer/commit/33c165552cf1f9f16720acac43ad5477d... (sorry for the noise from space trimming, the essential part is this: https://github.com/boostorg/integer/commit/33c165552cf1f9f16720acac43ad5477d... ) This fixes lcm_range function returning incorrect result if there is a value of 1 in the input range. CI tests passed, a few testers that picked up the change are also green.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:44 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 3/13/19 5:46 PM, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
May I merge this change to Boost.Integer master:
https://github.com/boostorg/integer/commit/33c165552cf1f9f16720acac43ad5477d...
(sorry for the noise from space trimming, the essential part is this:
https://github.com/boostorg/integer/commit/33c165552cf1f9f16720acac43ad5477d...
)
This fixes lcm_range function returning incorrect result if there is a value of 1 in the input range.
CI tests passed, a few testers that picked up the change are also green.
Approved. -- Marshall
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:47 AM Marshall Clow via Boost
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges
I've got the urge.... The urge - TO MERGE!!! How do you feel about this? https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/1546 Thanks
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:25 AM Vinnie Falco via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:47 AM Marshall Clow via Boost
wrote: The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges
I've got the urge....
The urge - TO MERGE!!! How do you feel about this?
How are the tests looking? If the tests are green, go ahead. -- Marshall P.S. That's a ton of diff markup for two lines of change ;-)
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask permission to merge the following bugfixes to master: https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/compare/master...bg-prepare-include Furthermore I'd like to push new test cases and documentation changes along with these fixes. They are not in the comparison above for convenience. Adam
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask permission to merge the following bugfixes to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/compare/master...bg-prepare-include
Furthermore I'd like to push new test cases and documentation changes along with these fixes. They are not in the comparison above for convenience.
That's a lot of changes. how to the test bots look? -- Marshall
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy> I ask permission to merge the following bugfixes to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/compare/master...bg-prepare-include
Furthermore I'd like to push new test cases and documentation changes along with these fixes. They are not in the comparison above for convenience.
That's a lot of changes. how to the test bots look?
AFAIU they're ok: https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/boost/builds/512048716 https://circleci.com/gh/boostorg/boost/11703 Geometry CI too: https://circleci.com/workflow-run/d25bd8d9-07eb-4ded-9519-cece8dc5fc1d Adam
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:45 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy> I ask permission to merge the following bugfixes to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/compare/master...bg-prepare-include
Furthermore I'd like to push new test cases and documentation changes along with these fixes. They are not in the comparison above for convenience.
That's a lot of changes. how to the test bots look?
AFAIU they're ok: https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/boost/builds/512048716 https://circleci.com/gh/boostorg/boost/11703 Geometry CI too: https://circleci.com/workflow-run/d25bd8d9-07eb-4ded-9519-cece8dc5fc1d
If you're happy with the test results, then go ahead. -- Marshall
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:45 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy> I ask permission to merge the following bugfixes to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/compare/master...bg-prepare-include
Furthermore I'd like to push new test cases and documentation changes along with these fixes. They are not in the comparison above for convenience.
That's a lot of changes. how to the test bots look? AFAIU they're ok: https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/boost/builds/512048716 https://circleci.com/gh/boostorg/boost/11703 Geometry CI too: https://circleci.com/workflow-run/d25bd8d9-07eb-4ded-9519-cece8dc5fc1d
If you're happy with the test results, then go ahead. Thanks.
Adam
On 13/03/2019 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
I'd like to merge the following container commit: https://github.com/boostorg/container/commit/0691018321f03aad662d7d2ae5b3e06... which solves clang gnu++98 and c++03 issues in Geometry: https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/issues/577 Best, Ion
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:48 AM Ion Gaztañaga via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 13/03/2019 15:46, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
-- The Boost Release Team
I'd like to merge the following container commit:
https://github.com/boostorg/container/commit/0691018321f03aad662d7d2ae5b3e06...
which solves clang gnu++98 and c++03 issues in Geometry:
Go ahead - as long as the tests are passing. -- Marshall
I have some documentation tidying: https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/1548 OK to merge?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:30 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I have some documentation tidying:
https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/1548
OK to merge?
Yes. -- Marshall
Do I have permission to merge to master a commit which adds [[nodiscard]] to outcome::failure_type and to outcome::success_type? Niall
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:01 PM Niall Douglas via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Do I have permission to merge to master a commit which adds [[nodiscard]] to outcome::failure_type and to outcome::success_type?
Have the tests cycled - do they look OK? When you're happy with the test results, then yes. -- Marshall
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:54 PM Marshall Clow via Boost
Have the tests cycled - do they look OK? When you're happy with the test results, then yes.
I need to merge this, what do you think? https://github.com/boostorg/beast/commit/7c084509d680c34089345af7eac90d27eff... I'm still waiting for tests, Travis/Appveyor look good Thanks
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:30 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I have some documentation tidying:
https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/1548
OK to merge?
Not just for Vinnie, but documentation improvements are always OK to merge. You don't need to ask about them. -- Marshall
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Marshall Clow via Boost
Not just for Vinnie, but documentation improvements are always OK to merge. You don't need to ask about them.
Well the snippet is in the docs but it is also in the tests so in theory the tests could break so I erred on the side of caution by asking. However, now there's a real bugfix that I would like to merge https://github.com/vinniefalco/beast/commit/51db4d491a027ce151c176b0d5ce3a62... Relevant defect: https://github.com/boostorg/beast/issues/1375 Thanks
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:07 PM Vinnie Falco
However, now there's a real bugfix that I would like to merge https://github.com/vinniefalco/beast/commit/51db4d491a027ce151c176b0d5ce3a62... https://github.com/boostorg/beast/issues/1375
I have a few more fixes I'd like to merge, here are the individual commits (including the previous one) *basic_parser::content_length is stable (API Change):* This fixes a bug in the value returend by basic_parser::content_length() https://github.com/vinniefalco/beast/commit/51db4d491a027ce151c176b0d5ce3a62... *test::stream has deprecated lowest_layer for ssl* This fixes a compilation error when used with ssl::stream https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/1549/commits/3c82717fed6a950dcd87ae26... *MSVC uses ::fopen_s* This fixes the warning cause by using the older std::fopen on MSVC https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/1549/commits/01bdea2b4d06c701699ab113...
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask permission to merge the following bugfixes to master: https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/compare/master...bg-prepare-include Adam
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 8:42 PM Adam Wulkiewicz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Marshall Clow Via Boost wrote:
The master branch is is now open for post-beta merges, but only as described in the Post-Beta Merge Policy. See < https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Releases%3A-Beta-Merge-Policy>
I ask permission to merge the following bugfixes to master:
https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/compare/master...bg-prepare-include
They all look straightforward except for 960ec9e. If you're happy with the test results, then you can merge. -- Marshall
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:40 AM Marshall Clow via Boost
If you're happy with the test results, then you can merge.
I'd like to merge this branch with a fix for websocket timeouts: https://github.com/boostorg/beast/pull/1553/commits Thanks
participants (11)
-
Adam Wulkiewicz
-
Andrey Semashev
-
Antony Polukhin
-
Hans Dembinski
-
Ion Gaztañaga
-
John Maddock
-
Marshall Clow
-
Niall Douglas
-
Peter Dimov
-
Raffi Enficiaud
-
Vinnie Falco