The boost config manual does not explicitly address the case where one is attempting to determine the relative lack of C++98 compliance of a cross-compiler (e.g., for an embedded system) that is not already within Boost's supported set of compilers.

Dave, may I ask what cross compilers you are considering for your investigations? Although I can not answer your question directly, I am also very interested in finding ways to adapt or extend Boost support to embedded systems compilers --- even for small micros. I am particularly interested in extending the range of Boost and C++ to compilers from suppliers such as IAR systems, Green Hills, and also selected GCC crosses. I am also sensing increased interest in the Boost and C++ communities regarding compilers not running *nix, Win32. There is, in my opinion, lots of work to do here --- especially when plain "int" is 16-bits in width or if an STL is lacking, or etc. Cheers, Chris On Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:06 PM, Dave Gomboc wrote: The boost config manual (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/config/doc/html/index.html) does not explicitly address the case where one is attempting to determine the relative lack of C++98 compliance of a cross-compiler (e.g., for an embedded system) that is not already within Boost's supported set of compilers. Is there a clear process documented somewhere for how to go about this?  If not, I would appreciate any tips.  I have more than one cross-compiler that I am interesting in "Boost"ing. Thanks, Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost