Niklas, How do you compare the results of running the same compiler on Linux and QNX? Do you just eyeball the report on the website, or do you use a script to compare the test results on the filesystem? Thanks and regards, Melanie -----Original Message----- From: Boost-Testing [mailto:boost-testing-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Niklas Angare Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:09 AM To: boost-testing@lists.boost.org Cc: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Linux regression test runners - What do devs want? "Tom Kent" wrote:

Instead of running lots of different versions, I was thinking about running various compatibility options of the two main compilers...I've seen some other test runners with things like libc++, c++11, c++14, etc. My real question, would developers be better served by these options than different versions? Would they prefer both with longer revisit times between each test type? Other thoughts?

My runners use gcc 4.4(.2) (in gnu++0x mode) on QNX, and it's useful to be able to compare to the same compiler running on Linux. I'm sure it's the same for other non-Linux environments such as MinGW. Currently there are other runners that match my compiler configuration better than yours do, but you get the idea. Regards, Niklas Angare _______________________________________________ Boost-Testing mailing list Boost-Testing@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-testing