Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1 - Boost - lists.stage.boost.cppalliance.org

newer
[outcome] Outcome v2 has reached...

Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1

older
[Boost] file transfer

Marshall Clow

13 Jul 2017 13 Jul '17

12:41 p.m.

Boost release 1.65.0 beta 1 is now available at: https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.65.0.beta.1/source/ The SHA256 checksums are as follows: d54d29568c4e4933cbfe40a292b6cb84a7f68121e34f6a83f7d0f7c652b6b2d8 boost_1_65_0_beta1.7z 092676557513e992347d30dd0cd058fb8af2a401e5da4f4413f5b577852d726b boost_1_65_0_beta1.tar.bz2 31fa3c807e2205e18f7d5c74f77f540677f7b0937af1e37f595c137e1e87bf84 boost_1_65_0_beta1.tar.gz 83c8d8b76fa9591572226a1a49fd191d76db3011b52b907cbbc8d37d46213bd2 boost_1_65_0_beta1.zip Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter. Thanks, -- The Boost Release Team

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Tom Kent

14 Jul 14 Jul

3:01 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Marshall Clow via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:

Boost release 1.65.0 beta 1 is now available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.65.0.beta.1/source/

The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

d54d29568c4e4933cbfe40a292b6cb84a7f68121e34f6a83f7d0f7c652b6b2d8 boost_1_65_0_beta1.7z 092676557513e992347d30dd0cd058fb8af2a401e5da4f4413f5b577852d726b boost_1_65_0_beta1.tar.bz2 31fa3c807e2205e18f7d5c74f77f540677f7b0937af1e37f595c137e1e87bf84 boost_1_65_0_beta1.tar.gz 83c8d8b76fa9591572226a1a49fd191d76db3011b52b907cbbc8d37d46213bd2 boost_1_65_0_beta1.zip

Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter.

Thanks,

-- The Boost Release Team

The windows binaries are available at: https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.65.0.beta.1/binaries/ Tom

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Marcel Raad

9:42 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1

Hi,

From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Marshall Clow via Boost-users Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2017 14:41 To: boost@lists.boost.org List ; boost-users@lists.boost.org; Boost announce list Cc: Marshall Clow Subject: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1

Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter.

I get multiple definition linker errors with MSVC 14.1 if I have boost/convert.hpp and boost/convert/strtol.hpp in my precompiled headers: error LNK2005: "bool __cdecl boost::cnv::is_space(wchar_t)" (??$is_space@_W@cnv@boost@@YA_N_W@Z) already defined in... Marcel

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Marcel Raad

11:17 a.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1

-----Original Message----- From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Marcel Raad via Boost-users Sent: Freitag, 14. Juli 2017 11:42 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org; boost@lists.boost.org List Cc: Marcel Raad Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1

I get multiple definition linker errors with MSVC 14.1 if I have boost/convert.hpp and boost/convert/strtol.hpp in my precompiled headers:

This fixes it for me: https://github.com/boostorg/convert/pull/30 Marcel

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Alain Miniussi

16 Jul 16 Jul

9:53 p.m.

New subject: [Boost-users] Boost 1.65.0 Beta 1

On 13/07/2017 14:41, Marshall Clow via Boost-users wrote:

Boost release 1.65.0 beta 1 is now available at:

<https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.65.0.beta.1/source/ https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.65.0.beta.1/source/> [...] Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter. Boost.MPI can failing, as it tries to include an implementation Boost.Serialization header that was removed. The problem was fixed today through https://github.com/boostorg/mpi/pull/49. Note that the problem seems not to show if there is a disbrib boost i /usr (as it might find the distrib header instead.

Thanks

Thanks,

-- The Boost Release Team

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Peppard

21 Jul 21 Jul

1:18 p.m.

On 2017-07-13 14:41, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter.

There seems to be a regression due to changes in boost/math/common_factor_ct.hpp (commit ceae76a526b45e902655f0c0db300d229e5ec135), a short example: #include #include The error message is "‘static_gcd’ is already declared in this scope" (GCC) or "target of using declaration conflicts with declaration already in scope" (Clang). The first include can be found in Boost.Units, the other one e.g. in Boost.Variant, in my case there was a file including boost/units/cmath.hpp and boost/signals2/signal.hpp. Thanks!

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

John Maddock

5:05 p.m.

On 21/07/2017 14:18, Peppard via Boost wrote:

On 2017-07-13 14:41, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter. There seems to be a regression due to changes in boost/math/common_factor_ct.hpp (commit ceae76a526b45e902655f0c0db300d229e5ec135), a short example:

#include #include

The error message is "‘static_gcd’ is already declared in this scope" (GCC) or "target of using declaration conflicts with declaration already in scope" (Clang).

The first include can be found in Boost.Units, the other one e.g. in Boost.Variant, in my case there was a file including boost/units/cmath.hpp and boost/signals2/signal.hpp.

Darn. I'll fix ASAP, it's not a new issue strictly speaking, but stems from moving gcd/lcm into integer from math a couple of releases ago. John. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Peppard

31 Jul 31 Jul

11:12 a.m.

On 2017-07-21 19:05, John Maddock via Boost wrote:

On 21/07/2017 14:18, Peppard via Boost wrote:

...
On 2017-07-13 14:41, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter. There seems to be a regression due to changes in boost/math/common_factor_ct.hpp (commit ceae76a526b45e902655f0c0db300d229e5ec135), a short example:

#include #include

The error message is "‘static_gcd’ is already declared in this scope" (GCC) or "target of using declaration conflicts with declaration already in scope" (Clang).

The first include can be found in Boost.Units, the other one e.g. in Boost.Variant, in my case there was a file including boost/units/cmath.hpp and boost/signals2/signal.hpp.

Darn. I'll fix ASAP, it's not a new issue strictly speaking, but stems from moving gcd/lcm into integer from math a couple of releases ago.

Will there be a Beta 2 including a fix for this problem? I'd be happy to test it before the official 1.65.0 release. Otherwise I'll probably have to test with a locally patched version (jzmaddock-patch-1?).

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Marshall Clow

3:04 p.m.

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Peppard via Boost wrote:

On 2017-07-21 19:05, John Maddock via Boost wrote:

...
On 21/07/2017 14:18, Peppard via Boost wrote:

...
On 2017-07-13 14:41, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...
Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you encounter. There seems to be a regression due to changes in boost/math/common_factor_ct.hpp (commit ceae76a526b45e902655f0c0db300d229e5ec135), a short example:

#include #include

The error message is "‘static_gcd’ is already declared in this scope" (GCC) or "target of using declaration conflicts with declaration already in scope" (Clang).

The first include can be found in Boost.Units, the other one e.g. in Boost.Variant, in my case there was a file including boost/units/cmath.hpp and boost/signals2/signal.hpp.

Darn. I'll fix ASAP, it's not a new issue strictly speaking, but stems from moving gcd/lcm into integer from math a couple of releases ago.

Will there be a Beta 2 including a fix for this problem? I'd be happy to test it before the official 1.65.0 release. Otherwise I'll probably have to test with a locally patched version (jzmaddock-patch-1?).

No. There will be a 1.65.0rc1 later this week. I'd appreciate it if you would test against that. -- Marshall

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

2675

Age (days ago)

2693

Last active (days ago)

Download

8 comments

6 participants

tags

participants (6)

Alain Miniussi
John Maddock
Marcel Raad
Marshall Clow
Peppard
Tom Kent