Hi, The official release schedule at http://www.boost.org/development/index.html seems to indicate we're now really close to the first beta of Boost 1.59, yet I don't see much activity in the mailing list and, for instance, the release notes are almost empty now: https://github.com/boostorg/website/blob/master/feed/history/boost_1_59_0.qb... Is this schedule still valid? Thank you, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Joaquin M LópezMuñoz
Hi,
The official release schedule at
http://www.boost.org/development/index.html
seems to indicate we're now really close to the first beta of Boost 1.59, yet I don't see much activity in the mailing list and, for instance, the release notes are almost empty now:
https://github.com/boostorg/website/blob/master/feed/history/boost_1_59_0.qb...
Is this schedule still valid? Thank you,
As far as I know. I'm planning on building a beta RC on Friday. -- Marshall
Marshall Clow
I'm planning on building a beta RC on Friday.
Could this Boost.Graph compile fix for MSVC 14 be merged to master, please? MSVC 14 RTM is going to be released in one and a half weeks. https://github.com/boostorg/graph/commit/0fc1749bd7b300b0ad7a6ec45eefff5ea90 57a0f
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Marcel Raad
Marshall Clow
writes: I'm planning on building a beta RC on Friday.
Could this Boost.Graph compile fix for MSVC 14 be merged to master, please? MSVC 14 RTM is going to be released in one and a half weeks.
https://github.com/boostorg/graph/commit/0fc1749bd7b300b0ad7a6ec45eefff5ea90 57a0f
I would like to merge some changes in Boost.Log too, please.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Marcel Raad
Marshall Clow
writes: I'm planning on building a beta RC on Friday.
Could this Boost.Graph compile fix for MSVC 14 be merged to master, please? MSVC 14 RTM is going to be released in one and a half weeks.
https://github.com/boostorg/graph/commit/0fc1749bd7b300b0ad7a6ec45eefff5ea90 57a0f
I think that this is a good candidate for "after the beta", but "before the release" -- Marshall
On 7/8/2015 10:44 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Joaquin M LópezMuñoz
wrote: Hi,
The official release schedule at
http://www.boost.org/development/index.html
seems to indicate we're now really close to the first beta of Boost 1.59, yet I don't see much activity in the mailing list and, for instance, the release notes are almost empty now:
https://github.com/boostorg/website/blob/master/feed/history/boost_1_59_0.qb...
Is this schedule still valid? Thank you,
As far as I know. I'm planning on building a beta RC on Friday.
This has really taken me by surprise. Was I supposed to know that 1.59 was going to be released shortly without so much as a single announcement on this mailing list ? In other words is it up to Boost developers to know when the timelines for each release would take place ? I never even got VMD to be regression tested on 'master' yet and I wanted to add it to the 1.59 release. Furthermore a number of 'develop' fixs in preprocessor and other libraries for which I have write access had never been merged to 'master' yet for testing. I guess none of these things will make it to Boost 1.59. I do apologize that I was not aware I should have been getting these fixes merged into 'master' and tested for the next release. None of the fixes are 'critical' but I definitely wanted to get some of them into 1.59.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Edward Diener
On 7/8/2015 10:44 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Joaquin M LópezMuñoz
wrote: Hi,
The official release schedule at
http://www.boost.org/development/index.html
seems to indicate we're now really close to the first beta of Boost 1.59, yet I don't see much activity in the mailing list and, for instance, the release notes are almost empty now:
https://github.com/boostorg/website/blob/master/feed/history/boost_1_59_0.qb...
Is this schedule still valid? Thank you,
As far as I know. I'm planning on building a beta RC on Friday.
This has really taken me by surprise. Was I supposed to know that 1.59 was going to be released shortly without so much as a single announcement on this mailing list ? In other words is it up to Boost developers to know when the timelines for each release would take place ?
The release calendar is always available at http://www.boost.org/development/
I never even got VMD to be regression tested on 'master' yet and I wanted to add it to the 1.59 release. Furthermore a number of 'develop' fixs in preprocessor and other libraries for which I have write access had never been merged to 'master' yet for testing. I guess none of these things will make it to Boost 1.59. I do apologize that I was not aware I should have been getting these fixes merged into 'master' and tested for the next release. None of the fixes are 'critical' but I definitely wanted to get some of them into 1.59.
After the beta, we will re-open master for bug fixes. (and you can get your bug fixes in then) -- Marshall
Le 08/07/15 16:44, Marshall Clow a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Joaquin M LópezMuñoz
wrote: As far as I know. I'm planning on building a beta RC on Friday.
-- Marshall
Hi, Boost.test v3 is already in master. There is a pending PR for updating the changelog of 1.59 with the changes of boost.test: https://github.com/boostorg/website/pull/89 Right now, boost.test documentation is built on develop: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/develop/libs/test/doc/html/index.html Apparently, the master branch is also using this process: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/test/doc/html/index.html I would like to make sure that this documentation will be visible on the final 1.59 documentation. How would I check this? Thanks, Raffi
participants (6)
-
Andrey Semashev
-
Edward Diener
-
Joaquin M López Muñoz
-
Marcel Raad
-
Marshall Clow
-
Raffi Enficiaud