Application 0.4.6 with global_context.
Hi All, I'd like to share this simple article on CP about 'Application 0.4.6'. http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/756866/Build-a-Server-Application-using-... This version removes Boost.Singularity dependence and add a global context. Let me know your comments. Source: https://github.com/retf/Boost.Application ReTF
On 4/12/2014 9:26 AM, Renato Forti wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to share this simple article on CP about 'Application 0.4.6'.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/756866/Build-a-Server-Application-using-...
This version removes Boost.Singularity dependence and add a global context. Let me know your comments.
I find the idea, to have a cross-platform way of creating daemons/services, worthwhile. I would like to suggest that the name be changed from Application, which is far too generic for just creating a computer program, to something more appropriate, maybe 'daemon'. I have never used the Mac, but does this extend to that OS ?
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Edward Diener
I find the idea, to have a cross-platform way of creating daemons/services, worthwhile. I would like to suggest that the name be changed from Application, which is far too generic for just creating a computer program, to something more appropriate, maybe 'daemon'.
It actually provide a way to make a non-daemon application (mentionned in the part about launching the app).
-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Klaim - Joël Lamotte Sent: 12 April 2014 21:20 To: Boost Developers List Subject: Re: [boost] Application 0.4.6 with global_context.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Edward Diener
wrote: I find the idea, to have a cross-platform way of creating daemons/services, worthwhile. I would like to suggest that the name be changed from Application, which is far too generic for just creating a computer program, to something more appropriate, maybe 'daemon'.
It actually provide a way to make a non-daemon application (mentionned in the
This name crossed my mind as well. part
about launching the app).
If the main usage is likely to be 'daemonic', then Boost.Daemon would still be a good name.
From the current name, one would be unlikely to guess that it could do daemon work?
Paul --- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 01539 561830
participants (4)
-
Edward Diener
-
Klaim - Joël Lamotte
-
Paul A. Bristow
-
Renato Forti