On 19 Apr 2014 at 10:44, Renato Forti wrote:

The proposed Boost.Application, needs a Review Manager. Anyone is interested?

So do a ton of other libraries waiting in the review queue. One trend I've noticed in recent reviews is that the libraries which find review managers are small, sometimes very small. It might be worth breaking up Application into smaller libraries if you want a faster review. Equally, AFIO has 1000 active lines of code, and I very much doubt it'll see a review manager any time soon. I'm thinking maybe next year it might (I will speak at C++ Now introducing the session on the Future of Boost, which will mention AFIO :) ). FYI, I'd just love if Application's design rationale told me why and how it's similar or different to Boost.Process. Process is one of the most popular non-official Boost libraries out there. Niall -- Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/