sob., 22 sie 2020, 18:48 użytkownik Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> napisał:

On 2020-08-22 17:57, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

...

But Boost.JSON needs a Review Manager! Don't be shy now!

Repository: https://github.com/cppalliance/json

Documentation: http://vinniefalco.github.io/doc/json/index.html

Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.

I was about to make similar remark. Those are spam-like subjects that make me personally want to send the message to trash w/o reading it. On practical side, it's not archive friendly too. Instead, I'd prefer to receive: "JSON library is looking for review manager" Mateusz Loskot, mateusz@loskot.net (Sent from mobile, may suffer from top-posting)

On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

...

Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.

My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?

If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;) One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:25 PM Janek Kozicki via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

How about this :)

Mateusz Loskot via Boost said: (by the date of Sat, 22 Aug 2020

20:46:16 +0200)

...

On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

...

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <

boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

...

...

...

Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.

My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?

If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;)

One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules.

Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

As far as I am concerned, the review manager must have deep understanding of the problem domain and not be in a position to gain from either acceptance or rejection. The review wizards' approval certifies that that's the case. Technically, as long as it _is_ the case, I don't see why a wizard can't be a manager.

On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:46, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

...

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

...

Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.

My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?

If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;)

One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules.

I proposed it here https://github.com/boostorg/website/pull/534 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net