On 6 October 2013 21:17, Stephen Kelly wrote:

On 10/06/2013 08:56 PM, Daniel James wrote:

...

Hi,

I added a little release notes for config, and also a note about removing support for older compilers in the future. If this concerns you, please give it a quick check and let me know if you want any changes. This release note is not a promise that future changes will or won't be made, and it can be changed if appropriate.

Sorry that this is a bit late. We can still change the release notes after the beta (and final) release, so don't worry about that.

Hello,

I can't find a boost websvn instance. How can I see this?

http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_55_0.html

On 10/06/2013 10:21 PM, Daniel James wrote:

On 6 October 2013 21:17, Stephen Kelly wrote:

...

On 10/06/2013 08:56 PM, Daniel James wrote:

...

Hi,

I added a little release notes for config, and also a note about removing support for older compilers in the future. If this concerns you, please give it a quick check and let me know if you want any changes. This release note is not a promise that future changes will or won't be made, and it can be changed if appropriate.

Sorry that this is a bit late. We can still change the release notes after the beta (and final) release, so don't worry about that. Hello,

I can't find a boost websvn instance. How can I see this? http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_55_0.html

Note that I'll be advocating for increasing the SunPro requirement to == 0x570 so that the BOOST_NO_SFINAE and BOOST_NO_ARRAY_TYPE_SPECIALIZATIONS macros can be removed. That's for a future thread of discussion, but I wanted to point it out. Thanks, Steve.

On Sunday 06 October 2013 21:21:16 Daniel James wrote:

On 6 October 2013 21:17, Stephen Kelly wrote:

...

On 10/06/2013 08:56 PM, Daniel James wrote:

...

Hi,

I added a little release notes for config, and also a note about removing support for older compilers in the future. If this concerns you, please give it a quick check and let me know if you want any changes. This release note is not a promise that future changes will or won't be made, and it can be changed if appropriate.

Sorry that this is a bit late. We can still change the release notes after the beta (and final) release, so don't worry about that.

Hello,

I can't find a boost websvn instance. How can I see this?

http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_55_0.html

In the News section, I read: We are consider removing support... I'm not a native speaker, but shouldn't it be "considering"?

On Oct 6, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Daniel James wrote:

...

On 10/06/2013 08:56 PM, Daniel James wrote:

...

I added a little release notes for config, and also a note about removing support for older compilers in the future. If this concerns you, please give it a quick check and let me know if you want any changes. This release note is not a promise that future changes will or won't be made, and it can be changed if appropriate.

Sorry that this is a bit late. We can still change the release notes after the beta (and final) release, so don't worry about that.

http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_55_0.html

Hi, For what it's worth, I'm still actively using Metrowerks C++ 2.4.1. Josh

On 6 October 2013 22:41, Daniel James wrote:

On 6 October 2013 22:16, Bjorn Reese wrote:

...

On 10/06/2013 08:56 PM, Daniel James wrote:

...

I added a little release notes for config, and also a note about removing support for older compilers in the future. If this concerns you, please give it a quick check and let me know if you want any changes. This release note is not a promise that future changes will or won't be made, and it can be changed if appropriate.

Does the "Now only support ..." comment under Config mean that we do not support clang?

No! I'll make it clearer. Thanks. Although if I were to be pedantic, Clang is a later compiler.

New version is up now. I fleshed it out a bit so that more details are in the news section.