Wanted: reviewers for boost.test doc overhaul
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup] As per the "What do we do about boost.test?" thread last year, the biggest complaint seemed to be the documentation. I'm overhauling the documentation using quickbook and I'd appreciate incremental feedback along the way. Any takers? -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline The Computer Graphics Museum http://computergraphicsmuseum.org The Terminals Wiki http://terminals.classiccmp.org Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com
I'm game.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Richard
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
As per the "What do we do about boost.test?" thread last year, the biggest complaint seemed to be the documentation.
I'm overhauling the documentation using quickbook and I'd appreciate incremental feedback along the way.
Any takers? -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book < http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Computer Graphics Museum http://computergraphicsmuseum.org The Terminals Wiki http://terminals.classiccmp.org Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Tom Kent
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Richard
wrote: [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
As per the "What do we do about boost.test?" thread last year, the biggest complaint seemed to be the documentation.
I'm overhauling the documentation using quickbook and I'd appreciate incremental feedback along the way.
Any takers?
I'm game.
Me too. Might be best to email me directly if you need something reviewing, as I check this list intermittently. Alex -- Swish - Easy SFTP for Windows Explorer (http://www.swish-sftp.org)
-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Richard Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 8:20 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] Wanted: reviewers for boost.test doc overhaul
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
As per the "What do we do about boost.test?" thread last year, the biggest complaint seemed to be
documentation.
I'm overhauling the documentation using quickbook and I'd appreciate incremental feedback along
the the
way.
Any takers?
I'm willing to help. Paul --- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow@hetp.u-net.com
Richard wrote:
As per the "What do we do about boost.test?" thread last year, the biggest complaint seemed to be the documentation.
I'm overhauling the documentation using quickbook and I'd appreciate incremental feedback along the way.
Any takers?
I'm interested. Please let me know when you have any new parts ready. (Disclaimer: I'm currently catching up with Boost email from the past two weeks so if you sent anything to the list in the meanwhile I should get there soon.) -Julian
participants (5)
-
Alexander Lamaison
-
Julian Gonggrijp
-
legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com
-
Paul A. Bristow
-
Tom Kent